Wednesday, March 26, 2014

Federal OUI Ticket In Massachusetts Lawyers 36 CFR 4.23

If you have been charged with OUI which took place on a road owned by the Federal government, National Park Service land, place on federally owned property, including military bases or other government-owned lands or roads, such as the GW Parkway and the Pentagon parking lot then you will be prosecuted in a Federal court. 

Under 36 CFR 4.23 Operating under the influence of alcohol or drugs

"(a)  Operating or being in actual physical control of a motor vehicle is prohibited while:
    (1)  Under the influence of alcohol, or a drug, or drugs, or any combination thereof, to a degree that renders the operator incapable of safe operation; or
    (2)  The alcohol concentration in the operator's blood or breath is 0.08 grams or more of alcohol per 100 milliliters of blood or 0.08 grams or more of alcohol per 210 liters of breath. Provided however, that if State law that applies to operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol establishes more restrictive limits of alcohol concentration in the operator's blood or breath, those limits supersede the limits specified in this paragraph."

Below is a sample case of federal DUI in Massachusetts as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm.

Have you been charged with federal DUI in Massachusetts and you are wondering what the penalty is for federal DUI and need a lawyer to defend you?

Are you concerned about the consequences of being charged with federal DUI in Massachusetts and you are wondering what the penalty is for federal DUI?

For a lot of our clients, a charge of federal DUI can result in the loss of their job, their security clearance, etc.

Don’t risk going to court without a lawyer, if you have been charged with a crime of federal DUI in Massachusetts.

Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.  We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

Charles v. United States

Facts:
Defendant was charged in Massachusetts with operating under the influence (OUI) of alcohol and/or drugs, in violation of 36 C.F.R. § 4.23(a)(1), and driving with a blood alcohol concentration of.08 or more, in violation of 36 C.F.R. § 4.23(a)(2).

If you are facing a federal DUI case in Massachusetts, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help.  You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

The Federal Court made the following holding:

  • The Fourth Amendment protects the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures. U.S. Const. amend. IV. The United States Supreme Court has held that an individual does possess a privacy interest in his blood for purposes of the Fourth Amendment.
  • The Fourth Amendment will only apply to governmental conduct that can reasonably be characterized as a search or a seizure. Where governmental conduct is motivated by investigatory or administrative purposes, it will fall within the scope of the Fourth Amendment since such conduct constitutes a search or seizure and, conversely, where governmental conduct is not actuated by an investigative or administrative purpose, it will not be considered a search or a seizure for Fourth Amendment purposes. The issue of whether or not the challenged conduct qualifies as conduct covered by the Fourth Amendment should not be confused with the issue of whether the defendant possessed a reasonable expectation of privacy in his blood. The United States Supreme Court has held that an individual possesses a privacy interest in his blood for purposes of the Fourth Amendment. In regard to the interplay between these two Fourth Amendment issues, the Court has stated: But the question of whether the challenged governmental conduct is the type of conduct proscribed by the Fourth Amendment analytically precedes the question of whether there is a privacy interest at stake.
Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.  We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

Disclaimer:


These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group.  They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions.  The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.

0 comments:

Powered by Blogger.

Popular Posts

Social Icons

Click here to call us toll free

Email Us:

First Name:
Last Name:
Email @:
Phone #: --
Message:

Our Phone #

Massachusetts

Cambridge 888-437-7747
Worcester 888-437-7747

About Mr. Gilmore

Mr. Gilmore earned his law degree at Boston University School of Law, one of the top law schools in the country. He obtained his undergraduate degree at Assumption College with a double major in Political Science and Philosophy. Prior to attending law school, he was a Bodily Injury Claims Adjuster with a large national insurer. Mr. Gilmore’s previous legal experience includes the Cape and Islands District Attorney’s Office and the Committee for Public Counsel Services-Trial Division. More about Gilmore